The Uprising (2026)

  • Director: Paul Greengrass
  • Screenplay: Paul Greengrass
  • Producer: Jason Blum, Gregory Goodman, Joanna Kaye, Joe Neurauter, Lars Sylvest
  • Cast: Andrew Garfield, Jamie Bell, Stephen Dillane, Tom Hollander, Cosmo Jarvis, Thomasin McKenzie, Jonny Lee Miller, Woody Norman, Katherine Waterston
  • Cinematography: Pål Ulvik Rokseth
  • Editing: William Goldenberg
  • Score: Volker Bertelmann
  • Genre: Historical action drama
  • Runtime: 128 minutes

A devastating disease. A huge wealth gap between common people and the upper classes. The oppression of those from a lower income background. Sound familiar?

The parallels with today’s society are as clear as day. In 1380s England, the Black Death has ravaged the country. King Richard II is not yet a man so his council carry out what actions they see fit. With money running out and the idea of taxing the church out the window, they decide to tax the labourers.

An unnamed ploughman (Andrew Garfield) sets alight a powder keg of rebellion when asked to pay his annual taxes. He is required either to pay death tax (for his deceased family) or the king’s tax. Whichever one leaves him out of pocket and after seeing guards molest young women, takes immediate action. He fights back, instigating a revolt which amasses a great number of peasants from up and down the land.

It’s so satisfying watching the common folk rising up and taking control of their lives. Of course, there’s always parties that take things to the extreme. Whereas the Ploughman seeks a meeting with the monarch to present a petition for a fairer society, cleric John Ball (Jamie Bell) is hungry for vengeance towards those he deems traitors. Ball, branded a heretic by the church, is an extremist who has the ear of his fellow man. And when he and his throng of rustics reach the capital, the ensuing riot gets out of hand. Foreign merchants are victimised. Yet more salient similarities.

The battle sequences are so cinematic. You can’t help rooting for the underdogs in the maelstrom: the peasantry. The drab garb of these people are in such contrast with the opulence of the nobility. Joan of Kent’s bejewelled headdress alone is a marvel. Being granted an audience with the royals is a disgusting event due to the display of affluence through their garments. Richard has some brass neck to greet his loyal servants whilst high up on horseback.

The film was, for a spell, marketed as a Robin Hood origin tale. I can understand why: an epilogue centres on the Ploughman and his crew, clad in green, accosting the carriage carrying the king. Robin in all but name. We want to see the king get his just desserts but the scene is wholly unnecessary. Gluing aspects of English folklore to the relevant real story of the Peasants’ Revolt is Greengrass ploughing the sand.

My rating: 7 / 10

We Live in Time (2024)

  • Director: John Crowley
  • Screenplay: Nick Payne
  • Cast: Andrew Garfield, Florence Pugh
  • Cinematography: Stuart Bentley
  • Editing: Justine Wright
  • Score: Bryce Dessner
  • Genre: Romantic drama
  • Runtime: 108 minutes

Take:

one plot.

Add:

a dollop of sentimentality.

a pinch of laugh out loud moments.

an ounce of hard-hitting reality.

Stir it all in a bowl, bake in the oven for 108 minutes – and voilà – you’ve got the touching story of a couple who navigate the chaos of illness and pregnancy, retaining warmth at its core.

Employing a non-linear structure, ‘We Live in Time‘ centres on chef Almut Brühl (Pugh) and Weetabix representative Tobias Durand (Garfield) (as to why they’ve randomly got Continental European-sounding names is anyone’s guess) and the decade they spend together. They meet when Almut runs Tobias down as he tries to cross a road at night whilst on the hunt for pens to sign divorce papers – not exactly the typical first date at Nando’s.

The timey-wimey narrative makes it a smidge confusing as to whereabouts they are in the timeline if not already spelled out to us viewers. Within the opening five minutes of the movie… *boom* Almut is suddenly pregnant …*boom* she’s now been diagnosed with cancer (the early reveal softens the blow a little, as opposed to a weepy second act revelation). It’s an unconventional approach to the usual ‘boy meets girl’ concept, a reflection of the unpredictable nature of life. You never know what’s going to hit you next (unless it’s Almut with her car again).

Other characters fade into the background – the film is carried by two engaging performances from Pugh and Garfield, the pair have a natural chemistry. Even though Almut’s fate is sealed at the beginning, you still root for the couple in spite of insurmountable odds.

Bring a box of tissues with you in case.

My rating: 8 / 10